After reading the Northrop and Sadoff (2013) article, summarize and analyze the decisions made regarding confidentiality and disclosure in forensic evaluations. In your main post, be sure to address the following:
What are the main facts of the case?
What were the major findings and rulings?
What were Chief Justice Kilbride’s main reasons for dissenting?
How does the court’s ruling compare/contrast with the APA Ethics Code? Consider the specific General Principles and Ethical Standards that relate.
Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not
Northrop, J. K., & Sadoff, R. L. (2013). Confidentiality and Disclosure of the Forensic Examination. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 41(2), 302. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f9e4/23e882aae0dcf1c18f93f1f9b6e4bfaa3373.pdf