Discussion 1 Clinical Psych

Book: Egan, G., & Reese, R. J. (2019). The skilled helper: A problem-management and opportunity-development approach to helping(11th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.

Chapter 1, “The Power of Basics: Explore the Ingredients of Successful Helping,” pages 3–42, which talks about the nature and goals of helping and some challenges facing the helping professions. This chapter also gives an overview of the helping process itself through a case illustration.
Chapter 3, “Commit Yourself to the Helping Relationship and the Values That Drive It,” pages 65–94.

Discussion Topic 1:

In the first chapter of your course text by Egan and Reese, they laid the groundwork for the skilled helper model. Discuss your impressions of this model in terms of its fit with your own ideas about how psychotherapy should work. Give specific examples of points of the model that are consistent and congruent with your own style. Identify any elements of the model that could pose difficulties for you, and explain why.

Discussion Topic 2

Empirical Support and Psychotherapy Research

Book:Pomerantz, A. M. (2017). Clinical psychology: Science, practice, and culture (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

In your Pomerantz text, issues of empirically supported therapy relationships are addressed. Based on your understanding of these readings and others you find, offer your analysis of this topic. Specifically, what does current research indicate about psychotherapy effectiveness? What are the critical factors? Should we look more carefully at the therapeutic relationship or at specific approaches to therapy, or should there be a different focus altogether?

Be sure to support your ideas with citations from the textbook and other scholarly sources, and list your references at the end of your post.

Chapter 11, “General Issues in Psychotherapy,” pages 244–270, which explores whether psychotherapy works, outlines efforts to identify empirically supported treatments, addresses the process of defining empirically supported therapy relationships, and considers the limitations of therapy work. This chapter also presents a general research summary of the centrality of the therapeutic relationship to psychotherapy outcomes. It presents the therapist’s emphasis and the concept of alliance as a generic therapy ingredient.


Learner Guidelines for Evaluation of Discussion Contributions
All discussion contributions will be read by your instructor each week. The instructor will provide feedback to you regarding your discussion postings. Expecting that every discussion posting and response contain all of the attributes of an exemplary discussion posting is setting a high standard for both you and the instructor. This level of high performance is the standard expected of graduate learners at Capella.

Attributes of an Exemplary Discussion Contribution or Response:
The discussion contribution or response clearly addresses the content issue(s) presented by the question.
The discussion contribution or response includes the appropriate level(s) of critical analysis.
The discussion contribution or response includes pertinent course and disciplinary concepts, theories, or materials, and applies them correctly.
The discussion contribution or response provides validation and support by including relevant examples and supporting evidence, as appropriate.
The discussion contribution or response stimulates fellow learners to clarify, extend, and strengthen their dialogue.
The discussion contribution or response is concise, clearly organized, and well structured.
The discussion contribution or response uses grammar, usage, and mechanics expected of graduate level composition and expression.
All citations and references adhere to APA 6th edition style.
The discussion contribution or response fosters collaboration with fellow learners and communicates in a manner that respects the dignity and integrity of fellow learners and the instructor.
The discussion response meaningfully supplements and extends consideration of the topic by including one of more of the following: new information, questions, constructive or corrective feedback, or alternative viewpoints.

Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -