Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity:
> Minimum of 2 scholarly sources – the following articles:
Link (library article): Are We Teaching Composition All Wrong?
Link (library article): No, We’re Not Teaching Composition ‘All Wrong’
Apply the following writing resources to your posts: Link (multimedia presentation): Citing References in Text Link (website): APA Citation and Writing
Part 1: Research & Review
Review the two short articles on the pros and cons of revision and peer review listed in Required Resources. As you read, think about your own experience writing and revising essays in this course (and other courses).
Part 2: Application
For the initial post, address the following:
> How did you go about selecting topics for the position papers?
> Reflect upon the research skills you have developed throughout this class. What key takeaways have you learned regarding research strategies?
> Compare your experiences with revision and feedback to those detailed in the Stewart (2016) and Teller (2016) articles. Which stance do you lean towards and why? Did you incorporate changes into your final essay based on your peers’ feedback? If so, please describe the types of changes you made and why you made them. If you did not incorporate changes, please explain why.
Cite your sources in APA format.
Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Do you agree or disagree with your peer’s stance on feedback and revision? Was your experience different or similar? How so? What advice might you give your fellow peers to establish more meaningful feedback?
Note: If you see that someone has already received feedback from two peers, please choose to help a peer who has yet to obtain feedback.
Writing Requirements Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up) APA format for in-text citations and list of references
These are the few feedback I received in the past which may help you write this reflection discussion
Final paper feedback (already shown you earlier): “Excellent final pro=con paper. Opposition and rebuttal pattern clear in organization; thesis is solid. APA is good overall for paper format and in-text citations, and tone/language is formal in the pro-con fashion. For the Refs. List, you should italicize journals and volume numbers. You also MUST always include retrieval information. I do not see any for any of your sources. Writing is thorough and sources appear to be credible, but URLs and/or doi #s were required.“
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more