Facebook Live Killings

Read the article “Cleveland Shooting Highlights Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos” located at http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306.

Write a 4–5-page paper in which you do the following:

Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Suggest and elaborate on three ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Propose two safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not it should create these roles.
Propose two changes Facebook should adopt to encourage the ethical use of its platform.
Use the (Strayer University Library) to locate two quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference, and proprietary websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides; citations and follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

Analyze the legal standing and situation of a specific business to achieve a defined result.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

NAME: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
DESCRIPTION: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A LEG500-A1-1
1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

LEG500-A1-2
2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

LEG500-A1-3
3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

LEG500-A1-4
4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they did not submit or incompletely discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they did not submit or incompletely debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they partially discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they partially debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they satisfactorily discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they satisfactorily debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they thoroughly discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they thoroughly debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

LEG500-A1-5
5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

LEG500-A1-6
6. 2 references
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9.79 (3.5%)

No references provided

Points Range: 9.8 (3.5%) – 11.19 (4%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Points Range: 11.2 (4%) – 12.59 (4.5%)

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range: 12.6 (4.5%) – 14 (5%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

LEG500-A1-7
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 19.59 (7%)

More than 6 errors present

Points Range: 19.6 (7%) – 22.39 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range: 22.4 (8%) – 25.19 (9%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range: 25.2 (9%) – 28 (10%)

0-2 errors present

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency