Fiedler’s Contingency Model Assignments Get Homework Help

Fiedler’s Contingency Model is an approach which analyzes the specifics of the situation and chooses a leadership style that would align well with it. Fiedler’s model requires assessment of a leadership style- task oriented or relationship oriented and matching it with the situation faced. Leadership style was measured using LPC scale (Least Preferred Co-Worker) which takes into account an individual’s relationship with a past coworker that he/she least enjoyed working with. As per the outlined model LPC scale along with the leader-member relationship and the position power of the leader would yield 1 out of 8 situations (Mind Tools, 2017). And then a leadership style would be chosen accordingly to effectively serve the situation.

“Interestingly enough, the score you get on the LPC score indicates something about you as a leader, not necessarily the person you were describing. High scores on the LPC mean that you are relationship oriented – you derive pleasure by building and maintaining relationships. Low LPC scores mean that you are task oriented – you derive pleasure from accomplishing tasks” (Anderson, 2016)

Fiedler’s model also had certain criticisms, one of it being that the model did not account for flexibility in a leadership style. Leadership style was gauged on an LPC score and this scoring technique was particularly biased for those that had extreme scores – High/Low LPC.

As far as an example, Disaster management would be one such situation/scenario where Fielder’s approach would be really efficient. The reason being the disaster hit area is lacking possible resources to come back to stability and would involve coordinating with multitude of affected people. So the task is unstructured. Introduction of an outside (disaster management authority) leader to carry out this work implies poor leader-member relations. And the leaders position power is weak too as a heavy handed leader won’t be accepted to lead the efforts. This gives us the most unfavorable scenario and the efficient leadership style for it would be Low LPC – task oriented approach.

# 2

Fiedler’s Contingency Model is an approach which analyzes the specifics of the situation and chooses a leadership style that would align well with it. Fiedler’s model requires assessment of a leadership style- task oriented or relationship oriented and matching it with the situation faced. Leadership style was measured using LPC scale (Least Preferred Co-Worker) which takes into account an individual’s relationship with a past coworker that he/she least enjoyed working with. As per the outlined model LPC scale along with the leader-member relationship and the position power of the leader would yield 1 out of 8 situations (Mind Tools, 2017). And then a leadership style would be chosen accordingly to effectively serve the situation.

“Interestingly enough, the score you get on the LPC score indicates something about you as a leader, not necessarily the person you were describing. High scores on the LPC mean that you are relationship oriented – you derive pleasure by building and maintaining relationships. Low LPC scores mean that you are task oriented – you derive pleasure from accomplishing tasks” (Anderson, 2016)

Fiedler’s model also had certain criticisms, one of it being that the model did not account for flexibility in a leadership style. Leadership style was gauged on an LPC score and this scoring technique was particularly biased for those that had extreme scores – High/Low LPC.

As far as an example, Disaster management would be one such situation/scenario where Fielder’s approach would be really efficient. The reason being the disaster hit area is lacking possible resources to come back to stability and would involve coordinating with multitude of affected people. So the task is unstructured. Introduction of an outside (disaster management authority) leader to carry out this work implies poor leader-member relations. And the leaders position power is weak too as a heavy handed leader won’t be accepted to lead the efforts. This gives us the most unfavorable scenario and the efficient leadership style for it would be Low LPC – task oriented approach.

Do the discussion assuming the hotel feid personal and complete the requirements.

#3

create conversation on the hotelxxx discussion between front office manager and the front office shift manager and answer the questons below

Speak with your manager or supervisor at work. Prepare at least one-page summary about your manager’s responses to the following three questions:

1) What training did you receive in order to achieve your position at the company?

2) What training did you wish you received? What training did you feel was unnecessary?

3) Thinking about your position, how do you feel you are received by your superiors and then by your employees?

# 4

write on quality inn hotel assistant shift manager create a learning working experience on the below task questions about 3-4 lines . ( write seperately for task 1 & 2 and create a seperate doc file )name them task1 & task2

task 1

1. Define production and operations management.

2. Identify division of work and organization structure.

3. Explain delegation and decentralization of authority.

4. Identify staffing in organizations.

5. Define management information systems and control

task 2

1. Assess the impact of changes in external factors, such as technology, politics, economics, etc. on organizational dynamics

2. Define principles of control.

3. Describe control methods and techniques.

4. Describe entrepreneurship and small business management.

5. Explain international management.

6. Describe career management and development.

7. Define organization development and change.

Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -