Portfolio project regarding ethical issues in healthcare

elect one of the following ethical issues in healthcare from the following choices:

Gender selection in human embryos
Stem cell transplants
Foregoing curative medical treatment due to religious beliefs
Futility of care
Abortion after six months.
If no topic listed here is of interest to you, contact your instructor for permission to consider a different topic.

Use the CSU Global Library and select Internet sources to conduct research on your chosen topic. Based on your research, provide the history of the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective. In your paper address the following questions:

Do the consequences of actions always direct what is morally required?
What should happen when two principles come into conflict? For example, should patient autonomy be considered more important than beneficence? Defend your position.
Are moral and ethically rules always binding, or are they only guidelines to be assessed in each case? Defend your position.
Your paper should meet the following requirements:

Be ten to twelve pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of eight scholarly references – four of these references must be from outside sources and four may be from course readings, lectures, and textbooks. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.
HCM420 Mod 8 PP

HCM420 Mod 8 PP

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpecification of Topic

70.0 to >56.0pts
Meets Expectation

The student clearly and thoroughly discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective.

56.0 to >42.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

The student discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective but has some significant, but not major, flaws in definition, support, and articulation.

42.0 to >28.0pts
Below Expectation

The student discusses the issue but has some major flaws and errors in definition, support, and articulation.

28.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

The student’s discussion has numerous major flaws and arguments are not defined, supported, and articulated.

70.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

70.0 to >56.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

56.0 to >42.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

42.0 to >28.0pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

28.0 to >0pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

70.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

80.0 to >64.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Conforms to project requirements regarding the specifications for selecting a topic; providing a legal ethical, a moral perspective; and answering questions posed in the assignment.

64.0 to >48.0pts
Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

48.0 to >32.0pts
Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

32.0 to >0pts
Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

80.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Findings

50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least eight credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

40.0 to >30.0pts
Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates six credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation

Cites and integrates three or four credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates two, or fewer credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

50.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

5.0 to >4.0pts
Meets Expectation

Applies critical thinking and reasoning skills for effective analysis.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in application of critical thinking skills.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in application of critical thinking skills.

2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Critical thinking and reasoning skills are absent or ineffective.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthics

5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Prescribes actions to effectively address a variety of ethical situations that support social responsibility.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Prescription of actions to address ethical situations is absent or ineffective.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership

5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates effective leadership and teamwork skills.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills is absent or ineffective.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology

5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Selects current technology applications and applies to specific problems and challenges in the work place and professional skills.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

No more than small number of minor flaws or omissions in selection of current technology applications.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in selection of current technology applications.

2.0 to >0pts
Limited Evidence

Selection of current technology applications is absent or ineffective.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Essay or PowerPoint is clearly organized, well written, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style

20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

20.0 to >16.0pts
Meets Expectation

Includes all items listed on APA rubric and includes less than two APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted.

16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Omits up to two items listed on APA rubric and includes less than four APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted with minor mistakes.

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation

Omits up to four items listed on APA rubric and includes less than six APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page include numerous mistakes.

8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Omits five or more items listed on APA rubric and includes seven or more APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are incorrectly formatted.

20.0pts

Total Points: 350.0

 

 

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency