When presenting a plan for change in the workplace, you must first identify and substantiate a problem, which you accomplished in Weeks 1 & 2. Once you have identified a problem and substantiated the problem by analyzing peer-reviewed literature, you should address biases and/or counter arguments about the problem in your professional field or discipline.
This week, you will incorporate the practice piece of the SPL Model and add to your discussion by analyzing and evaluating additional peer-reviewed literature to address contradictions in the literature.
Locate a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed articles (in addition to those you found in Week 2) in your professional field or discipline (that is, professional journal articles, not scholarly journal articles) that focuses on the problem you identified in Week 1. Be sure to find articles published within the last 5 years.
Analyze and evaluate the articles by adding them to the analytical framework you created in Week 2, noting different authors’ perspectives. Analyzing and evaluating authors’ differing perspectives, also called arguments, will provide you with a better understanding of the topic to advance your own points of view and advance your scholarly voice. Append (place in the appendix) the paper you submit with this matrix.
*** For information on building a scholarly argument, visit Doctoral Writing Resourcesand review the information under Argument Construction.
Revise the pieces you wrote/revised in Weeks 1 and 2.
Write 1-2-pages discussing the similarities and differences among the authors’ perspectives on your identified problem. You may find it helpful to identify in the readings 2 main topics about the stated problem and use those topics in your analytical framework and as subheadings in your paper.
Write using scholarly voice.
Insert the discussion in the Executive Summary Template where appropriate.
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more