The lesson planning process

The purpose of this CRR is for you to familiarize yourself with the readings you will be teaching during your chosen team-teach week. There’s no need to do a super close read of the articles. Skim through them (somewhat carefully) to respond to the prompts below. You will need to refer to your CRR when we meet next week (Week 8) to start the lesson planning process.

Instructions:

Step 1: Read/skim the content assigned to the week you’ve chosen to sign up for your team-teach, and highlight/note sections of the text that you feel are relevant

Step 2: For each reading, articulate the author’s main ideas/theory and key concepts in bullet point format

Step 3: Articulate the connections that you see across the set of readings in bullet point format

Step 4: Discuss the connections between your readings and the content we’ve covered for the past seven weeks. For example, how does Marx’s theory of historical materialism relate to Valenzuela’s concept of “subtractive schooling”?

Step 5: Write at least three questions that you would ask students (like those you have seen in past CRRs) that you think could operate as signposts to assist students with (1) the identification of key concepts, (2) attending to central connections across the set of readings for that week, and (3) identifying connections between this week’s set of readings and the previous material covered during weeks 2-7.

Step 6: Think about two possible activities you might ask W 190 students to do during your team-teach to better understand the readings and accompanying digital tools you would want students to use as part of their learning process (e.g., concept mapping with Sketchboard IO, or video making with FlipGrid). Write these ideas down in bullet point form/draft narrative. They don’t have to be fully fleshed-out. I just want you to start thinking about this and get some of your ideas down.

Rubric

Team Teach CRR

Team Teach CRR 

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Points of Readings
5.0 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks 

Student articulates readings‘ main ideas, theories, and key concepts

0.0 ptsNo Marks 

Student does not articulate readings‘ main ideas, theories, and key concepts

5.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections Across Readings in Week and Course
2.5 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks 

Student identifies and articulates connections across the set of readings assigned for the team-teach week of choice. And also identifies connections between readings for that week and readings from previous weeks of the course.

0.0 ptsNo Marks 

Student does not identify and articulate connections across the set of readings assigned for the team-teach week of choice. Student does not also identify connections between readings for that week and readings from previous weeks of the course.

2.5pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePoses Three Questions
5.0 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks 

Student poses at least three questions that could operate as signposts to assist students with (1) the identification of key concepts, (2) attending to central connections across the set of readings for that week, and (3) identifying connections between this week’s set of readings and the previous material covered during weeks 2-7.

0.0 ptsNo Marks 

Student does not pose at least three questions that could operate as signposts to assist students with (1) the identification of key concepts, (2) attending to central connections across the set of readings for that week, and (3) identifying connections between this week’s set of readings and the previous material covered during weeks 2-7.

5.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe two possible activities
2.5 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks 

Student describes two possible activities they might ask W 190 students to do during their team-teach to better understand the readings and accompanying digital tools they want students to use as part of their learning process (e.g., concept mapping with Sketchboard IO, or video making with FlipGrid).

0.0 ptsNo Marks 

Student does not describe two possible activities they might ask W 190 students to do during their team-teach to better understand the readings and accompanying digital tools they want students to use as part of their learning process (e.g., concept mapping with Sketchboard IO, or video making with FlipGrid).

2.5pts
Total Points: 15.0

also use this video

https://youtu.be/4XgaAZGyy04

Main readings:

Week 10: Structural Inequality in Schools and Classrooms
  • Nasir, N., et al. (2013). Racial Storylines and Implications for Learning. (pp. 285-298Preview the document)
  • Oakes, J. (1985). Tracking. In J. Oakes, Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (pp. 1-14Preview the document)
  • and the video

I uploaded more reading since I need to connect them with the readings that I am doing

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency